Research
IronHead research
The research arm behind the IronHead guide catalog. Each published guide is the end of a sourcing-and-scoring pipeline — here you can read the shortlist of candidate models the team is evaluating next, and the rubric that decides which ones make the cut and how the published guides stay accurate over time.
Latest analyses
Scoring rubric
How a model is scored.
Documentation depth, restoration frequency, parts availability, and coverage gap folded into a single four-axis rubric — the standard every candidate shortlist entry has to clear before the research team commits five months of source work.
Read the methodology →Candidate shortlist
Next vintage models shortlist.
Five candidate models beyond the initial 25-guide plan, ranked by qualitative demand — documentation depth, restoration frequency, parts availability, and the coverage gap each one closes against the existing catalog.
Read the shortlist →Model evaluations
Model evaluations in the catalog.
Every published guide in the catalog is the end-state of the same sourcing-and- scoring pipeline — a 30+ page restoration doc you can read end to end is the artifact the research team ships once a candidate model clears the shortlist rubric.
Browse model evaluations →Research surfaces
Shortlist
Methodology